Win the cheapest execution that still works
On every request, in this order. When there is nothing to trim, it changes nothing.
- 1
Avoid the call
If the answer already exists — local resolvers, exact or semantic cache — the model is never called. Zero calls is the cheapest saving there is.
- 2
Avoid retrieval and tools
Decide the route before spending: none, one, several, or a tool. Fewer chained calls for the same job.
- 3
Remove the context that is not needed
Deduplicate, reorder and adjust how much context goes in. Fewer input tokens without changing what is asked.
- 4
Compress what is left
Lighter encoding, and only when the balance comes out positive. Compressing for its own sake can cost more.
- 5
Constrain the output
Schema and a minimal contract, because the output token is the expensive one. It is also the lever that can come out negative, and that gets published when it does.
How it is measured, which matters more than the figure
A savings percentage is not a fact: it is a claim about somebody else's bill.
Both arms, same tokenizer
For each scenario the naive request and the optimised one go to the same model, and both are priced from the token usage the provider itself reports. Nothing is modelled.
The floor is published, not the flattering figure
What is reported is the lower bound of the 95 % confidence interval, not the point estimate. It is the hardest number to show and the only one that survives an audit.
Four books that are never added up
Each lever is measured separately, so a euro cannot be counted twice. The reconciliation residual proves it.
A worse answer cancels its own saving
Quality control travels with the measurement. Saving by degrading the answer is not saving.
What it does not do
Three things the tool itself tells you before you find them out.
There is not always something to trim
Some scenarios are already optimal and the result is zero; in others a lever comes out negative. The verifier shows that rather than hiding it.
The reference figures are measured against a simulated provider
They prove the mechanism works, not what your bill will be. The product page labels every number, and a real run will replace them.
Your live path measures different levers
A real run does not measure exactly what the reference run measures, so the two are never equated or compared.
What you can get today
We are in early access. This is exactly what exists and what does not yet.
- In-browser verifier
- Works today · no signup · nothing leaves the page
- Bill projector
- Works today, as an estimate
- Measurement against a real provider
- Not yet: the published figures come from a simulated provider
- Self-serve signup and payment
- Not available yet
“At BiVelio we believe companies need tools that let them organize processes, automate tasks and scale their operations. Our team is here to help you take the next step.”
Joan-Marc Fisa
Founder & CEO, BiVelio
From €89/month billed annually.